Stats NZ has a new website.

For new releases go to

www.stats.govt.nz

As we transition to our new site, you'll still find some Stats NZ information here on this archive site.

  • Share this page to Facebook
  • Share this page to Twitter
  • Share this page to Google+
2013 Census QuickStats about a place:
Mosgiel South
Business

Business demographics

Business demographic data for the year ended February 2013 showed that:

  • There were 237 business locations (geographic units) in Mosgiel South compared with 10,771 for all of Dunedin City. This is a decrease of 3.7 percent from the year ended February 2006 for Mosgiel South.
  • There were 990 paid employees in Mosgiel South compared with 52,890 for all of Dunedin City. This is a decrease of 1.0 percent from the year ended February 2006 for Mosgiel South.

Top five industries in Mosgiel South
By employee count
For year ended February 2013
 
Industry (ANZSIC06)(1) Mosgiel South Dunedin City
Employee count Percent of total employee count Employee Count Percent of total employee count
Health care and social assistance 160 16.2 8,240 15.6
Education and training 160 16.2 7,570 14.3
Retail trade 140 14.1 6,310 11.9
Accommodation and food services 130 13.1 4,390 8.3
Construction 110 11.1 3,260 6.2

1. Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification 2006 (ANZSIC06 V1.0).
Note: Table may not show five industries as not all area units have five industries within their boundaries.
Some area units may have more than one industry with the same employee count but the table has been restricted to five industries.
Source: Statistics New Zealand


Note: Business demographic data is sourced from a register of economically significant businesses which is maintained by Statistics New Zealand. See data quality information on business demographics.

Employee count data has been randomly rounded. Individual figures may not add up to totals, and values for the same data may vary in different text, tables and graphs. For areas with small populations, the data may not look as expected because of this rounding.

  • Share this page to Facebook
  • Share this page to Twitter
  • Share this page to Google+
Top
  • Share this page to Facebook
  • Share this page to Twitter
  • Share this page to Google+