Stats NZ has a new website.

For new releases go to

As we transition to our new site, you'll still find some Stats NZ information here on this archive site.

  • Share this page to Facebook
  • Share this page to Twitter
  • Share this page to Google+
Tourism value added

Direct tourism value added

Direct tourism value added calculations are usually made at a finer level of industry detail than is presented in table 10. For reasons of confidentiality and practicality, we show only the working level of calculations in this report.

We calculate the tourism industry ratio by dividing tourism supply by industry by the total supply for that industry. The tourism industry ratio represents the proportion of each industry’s output that is consumed by tourists.

We multiply tourism industry ratios through each production account for all industries to produce direct tourism value added. This is summarised and presented in table 10 for the years ended March 2012–15.

Download tables 1–14 (Excel, 16 sheets, 335kb) 

Point to note from table 10:

  • Between 2012 and 2015, direct tourism value added (also referred to as tourism’s direct contribution to GDP) increased 11.1 percent, a slower rate than the contribution to GDP from domestic production, which increased 13.4 percent.

As shown in figure 1, total expenditure on goods and services by tourists ($29.8 billion in 2015) consists of three components:

  • Goods and services worth $23.6 billion produced in New Zealand and directly purchased by tourists. Direct tourism output consisted of $2.8 billion of intermediate inputs, and $10.6 billion of direct tourism value added.
  • Imports of $3.7 billion sold directly to tourists by retailers.
  • GST of $2.5 billion paid on goods and services purchased by tourists.

Domestically produced goods are sold directly to tourists by retailers, and only the retail margin (production value of the turnover of the retailer) of these sold goods is recorded in the direct tourism value added. The value added in the production of these goods is not part of tourism direct gross value added, but is to be considered within the indirect effects.

Indirect tourism value added and imports

As well as measuring direct tourism value added, Tourism Satellite Account: 2015 reports on indirect tourism value added (or tourism’s indirect contribution to GDP). This broader measure goes beyond the value added generated by producers directly supplying tourism products, and embraces the total value added of all producers both directly and indirectly.

Measuring indirect tourism value added involves tracing the flow-on effects of businesses’ intermediate purchases that are used directly in producing tourism products (see figure 1) and measuring the cumulative value added these purchases generate.

For example, the intermediate purchases of the ‘accommodation’ and ‘food and beverage services’ industries include items such as electricity, bedding, and food purchased from other industries or imports. In turn, these other industries will have made intermediate purchases from other industries (or from overseas) in order to produce the items they sell to the accommodation and food and beverage services industries. So the sequence continues, until all intermediate purchases can be directly accounted for, either as value added or imports.

Measuring indirect tourism’s contribution to GDP involves summing the value added of each industry that is generated throughout this sequence. The New Zealand TSA covers the intermediate consumption related to direct tourist expenditure. Total tourism expenditure can be explained in terms of:

  • direct tourism value added
  • indirect tourism value added
  • imports (those directly sold to tourists and those used indirectly in production)
  • GST.

Note that some of tourism’s indirect demand for intermediate inputs will not be met by the output of New Zealand producers, but by imports that provide no direct contribution to New Zealand’s GDP. For more information, refer to Quarterly gross domestic product: Sources and methods (fourth edition) (2014).

Table 11 summarises the relationship between the various components of tourism expenditure.

Download tables 1–14 (Excel, 16 sheets, 335kb) 

Direct tourism value added does not necessarily show the same movement as tourism expenditure. This is because changes in expenditure patterns flow through into the composition of industries that supply products consumed by tourists.

Changing industry composition flows through into other economic aggregates. This can lead to a result where the different industries that contribute to tourism have varying value added to output ratios.

Movements in the value of imports sold directly to tourists and in imports used in the production of goods and services sold to tourists are strongly influenced by exchange rate variations and changes in the mix of products purchased. Table 11 shows that in the year ended March 2015 these imports rose 9.6 percent, and total tourism expenditure rose 10.3 percent.

Tourism expenditure can also be presented by the share of each component, as shown in table 12 for the years ended March 2012–15. 

Download tables 1–14 (Excel, 16 sheets, 335kb) 

  • Share this page to Facebook
  • Share this page to Twitter
  • Share this page to Google+
  • Share this page to Facebook
  • Share this page to Twitter
  • Share this page to Google+